Andrei: The intrinsic value of a watch is the ability to tell the time. But next to it, comes a series of let’s say features, like design and complications. Which is your favourite watch complication (or watch function)? (Mine is self-winding. I consider the automatic watches extremely practical. For me, it is even more important as the precision).
Ming:I like interactive complications: things where we can see as well as directly trigger the mechanics. This means chronographs, alarms, repeaters and sonneries; I wish I could say it is a chiming complication but I do not have enough experience with them, and unfortunately no chance yet to own one. (If it ever happens, I will probably have to make my own). The chronograph is the most accessible of these, ranging from simple mecaquartz to split and flying seconds – and any mechanical interpretations of it present plenty to appreciate visually, as well as presenting a useful complication and satisfying tactility when pressing well-adjusted chronograph buttons. Personally, this gap in the MING lineup is something I would like to rectify sooner rather than later, but movement choices are challenging: either too common if affordable, or stratospheric if something special. There is also the challenge of making the indications fit with our admittedly very symmetric and circular design language – subdials look a bit out of place. For now, we keep searching…
Andrei: Which is your favourite decorating technique? (Mine is perlage – it is a widespread choice for the main plate decorations and often, in my limited experience, reveals the true value of a watch).
Ming:I think skeletonization counts as a decoration technique – not the ornate kind, that feels like filigree or too baroque and becomes the focus of the movement instead of the mechanics. Nor the kind that takes away so much material that the movement no longer has a canvas – I am not sure one’s wrist is the best presentation for such mechanics. I believe we found a nice balance with the 19.01 and 19.02 where we left a solid baseplate, but a functional skeleton that opens up as much of the bridges as possible. We combine this with simple matte surfacing (itself not easy to do in a uniformly flawless way whilst retaining crisp edges and polished anglage), this allows maximum appreciation of the gear train and mechanics. There is also a different kind of skeletonization on the other side, with the baseplate being partially revealed by the gradient sapphire dial; it’s this layering and interplay of light (you can see my experience as a photographer influencing things here) that I think keeps a watch visually dynamic and interesting.
About Ming Thein and my (digital) encounter with him and his work
Ming Thein is part of an old list of favourite people. I have first encountered his work as a photographer. A set of pictures of the Jaeger-LeCoultre Gyrotourbillon II (one of my favourite watches ever) made me want to discover more of his work.
So I follow Ming for years. I strongly recommend having a look at his Ming Thein Photographer website. You will discover not only beautiful watch pictures but also street photography, product and portrait photography. And an impressive amount of technical reviews and photographic techniques. You also can have a look at his Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/blog.mingthein/.
Thank you, Ming, for your time and for your inspiring work. A nice Sunday to all of you!
Reading Time: 4minutes When we unveiled the original Mosaic in 2020, there was a lot of demand to have something similar in a more accessible model. Given the nature of the sapphire-based process however, this is not possible as each mosaic dial costs quite a bit more than an entire 17-series watch to […]